Discovery of the Materialist Conception of History in the Writings of the Young Karl Marx

Description

The debate over the continuity between Marx’s early and later writings is now more than fifty years old and final resolution of the debate seems as remote as ever. Since the early 1970’s the “continuity view” proposed by Shlomo Avineri and Istvan Meszaros has been generally regarded as the most plausible account of the linkage between these writings, while the most prominent alternative to this view has been the widely-criticized “epistemological break” thesis proposed by French philosopher Louis Althusser in the 1960s. A review of the literature since the late 1970’s indicates that the main arguments upon which the continuity view was based have been increasingly undermined as new knowledge of the circumstances of Marx’s work in the 1840’s has been developed. Marx’s relationship to two “Young Hegelian” philosophers, Ludwig Feuerbach and Max Stirner, has emerged as an especially important aspect of the issue. This study, drawing on the recent literature as well as additional original research in areas suggested by Althusser’s discussion in his book For Marx, outlines a modified epistemological break thesis. In addition to showing that Marx was a “Feuerbachian” in 1843/44 and documenting his break with Feuerbach in 1845, the study will also explain why Marx broke with Feuerbach when he did and in the way he did, an explanation that is lacking in Althusser’s discussion of Marxs epistemological break. The explanation developed here is based on a study of the impact on Marx and Engels and the other Young Hegelians of Stirner’s book The Ego and His Own, published in Germany in late 1844. The study concludes with a discussion of Marx’s general intellectual development from 1843 through 1845.